- What does the term "discursive practices"
mean?
Discursive
practices, in this reading, are authorized discourses of the setting in which
information literacy is enacted as a situated, collective, and embodied
practice that engages people with information and knowledge about domains of
action.
- What does "discourse" mean?
Discourse
is a formulated association of concepts and context that are legitimized by the
ones interacting within its setting.
- What is the "rock" and what is the "hard
place"?
The “rock”
is a current conception of information literacy, while the “hard place” is the
translation and understanding of information literacy practice.
- What are the differences between the skills prescribed
for information searching in academic and workplace settings?
The
information in academia is often formalized by particular rules, regulations
and curriculum that are guided by a specific rationale; however, the workplace
is messy, complex, and distributed through a range of practices that are
entwined to contribute to the collective performance of the work.
- How do academic notions
of information literacy undermine workplace
notions information literacy?
Academic
notions of information literacy are an organized depiction of workplace notions
of information literacy. Academic information literacy would be far more
helpful to students if it represented the vast array of knowledge and skills
needed for workplace notions of information literacy.
- How are information needs identified in work place
setting like nursing and emergency workers?
Information
needs are identified in work place settings like nursing and emergency workers
by the dominant and codified knowledge of the medical profession, which acts as
the knowledge authority in relation to medical need, practice, and procedure.
For example, nurses’ information need is developed by doctors that are
considered the lead authority. As far as emergency workers, their information
needs come from a group working collectively to share information, which in
turn allows for common understanding about how practice and performance should
proceed to develop.
- Why do issues
of plagiarism not resonate in workplace settings?
Issues
of plagiarism do not resonate in workplace settings because it is considered a
collective possession and then is disseminated and circulated throughout the
workplace, by storytelling, and extended through the distributed networks of
professional practice.
- Are information literacy skills transferable across
contexts and settings? Why or Why not?
Information
literacy skills are not transferable across contexts and settings because one
word can be used different ways in various settings. One would have to know in
which context it was used in order to fully understand and apply the
information given. Information literacy skills are specified to each setting
that a person interacts with, and thus, not transferable across contexts and
settings.
- What is "practice theory"?
Practice
theories emphasize the analysis of ways of engaging with the world.
- How does the author of this article define information
literacy?
Information
literacy is a critical information practice that encompasses not only the
mastery of information but also a mastery of the information landscape.
- How do educators need to change their understanding
of information literacy in order to prepare student for the
information literacy practices they will encounter in workplace settings?
Educators
must focus their research efforts toward understanding information literacy, so
that our students can adapt and adopt their information practices to suit ever-changing
environments, such as done in the workplace.
- What do the terms "ontological" and
"epistemological" mean?
Ontological
and epistemological means that they are the settings of information and
knowledge that bounds the practice of information literacy. They are a critical
feature of context and forms part of any holistic analysis of information
literacy practice. This is the setting where information is shared, enabled,
and/or constrained.
- After reading this article, how useful is the
traditional research paper we expect students to produce in school in
preparing them for workplace settings? What
are traditional research papers useful for? Should we
still assign traditional research papers?
The
traditional research paper we expect students to produce in school is not
useful in preparing them for workplace settings. The traditional research
papers are useful for describing the purpose of information skills in relation
to the research process. I believe that we still should assign research papers because
it structures the first baby-steps in gathering information from resources. It
makes students think about where the information comes from and teaches some
information literacy skills. However, I do not believe that it prepares students
for the workplace, unless they were to become a researcher at a University.
- What is one of the biggest challenges to changing the
way information literacy is conceptualized in school settings?
The
biggest challenge to changing the way information literacy is conceptualized in
school settings is the idea of it being a collaborative and shared experience
rather than an individualistic task. So often, schools promote individual and
original work, that students have trouble collaborating with others. It’s these
skills that will most benefit a student in the workplace. However, traditions and
habits are the most difficult things to break.
- What attributes of the 21st century make it
essential that educators change their approaches toward information
literacy?
Students
have to learn to change their information literacy based upon the setting and
environment they’re in. Students need to be able to adapt and adopt different
information practices, which is what the workplace requires.
- What changes can teachers make to their classroom
activities to engage students in the information literacy practices
they will encounter in 21st century workplace settings?
I believe
that research-based group work would be a good way to engage students in the
information literacy practices they will encounter in the 31st
century workplace setting. Also, giving students a problem and letting them
discover strategies to answer that problem would be a good activity for
students to become less reliant on structure and more dependent on
collaboration with their peers.
Lloyd, A.
(2011). Trapped between a Rock and a Hard Place: What Counts as Information Literacy in the Workplace and How Is It Conceptualized? Library Trends,
60 (2) pp. 277-296.
You were very detailed in your definitions - this made me actually better understand the words
ReplyDeleteI like your view on the traditional research paper. It helped me think a little differently about it; just because something is does not prepare you for the work place doesn't make the experiences of creating and working on it pointless.
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with your answer for "the biggest challenges to changing the way information literacy is conceptualized in school." I think that with our schools moving into the Next Gen standards, we will be seeing more collaboration.
ReplyDelete